Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
guppiecat: (Default)
[personal profile] guppiecat
I assume you've all heard about the Clarcon recall.

I just wanted to point out that, at its core, the problem is (paraphrased) "skin sanitizers and skin protectants that contain high levels of disease-causing bacteria".

Yeah, the sanitizer is laden with bacteria. Am I wrong or is that the sort of thing that just shouldn't happen? It's like seeing a recall on fire extinguishers because they could explode and burn the house down.

Date: 2009-06-09 02:26 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] karenkay.livejournal.com
It seems like an oxymoron. Wouldn't the stuff in the sanitizer kill the bacteria?

Date: 2009-06-09 02:27 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vylar-kaftan.livejournal.com
Maybe they have insufficient alcohol content. Like a beauty product, marketed as sanitizer, but it isn't strong enough to be effective.

Date: 2009-06-09 02:56 am (UTC)
ext_14676: (Default)
From: [identity profile] bkwrrm-tx.livejournal.com
Oh, that's just wonderful. :-(

I liked the line products revealed high levels of various bacteria, including some associated with unsanitary conditions.

So, sterile working conditions - not.

Date: 2009-06-09 03:05 am (UTC)
ext_29896: Lilacs in grandmother's vase on my piano (Default)
From: [identity profile] glinda-w.livejournal.com
That's what I'd have expected... sheesh.

Date: 2009-06-09 04:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] t-giselle.livejournal.com
Baffling. And oh, so very wrong.

Date: 2009-06-09 06:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hitchhiker.livejournal.com
yeah - so it wasn't even a good sanitiser!

Profile

guppiecat: (Default)
guppiecat

April 2026

S M T W T F S
   1234
567 891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Page generated Apr. 13th, 2026 04:07 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios