LinkyPost - Mosquitoes
Mar. 17th, 2009 10:48 amI hate mosquitoes. You hate mosquitoes. We all hate mosquitoes.
But, do you hate mosquitoes enough to build a laser-based eradication system?
Personally, I'd rather just bring in a few hundred dragonflies... but maybe that's just me.
But, do you hate mosquitoes enough to build a laser-based eradication system?
Personally, I'd rather just bring in a few hundred dragonflies... but maybe that's just me.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-17 04:10 pm (UTC)I don't know the answer to this obvious question.
Otherwise, I'm happy that Jordin gets paid to develop cool stuff...
no subject
Date: 2009-03-17 04:59 pm (UTC)I checked around the net, and while I cannot find a range map for dragonflies, I did see references to dragonflies in most cultures in most parts of the world. So, until anyone can show me otherwise, I'm assuming that dragonflies are just as prevalent as mosquitoes.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-17 05:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-17 04:39 pm (UTC)Besides, dragonflies are cool. Anywhere we can buy them in bulk?
no subject
Date: 2009-03-17 05:02 pm (UTC)(and here)
Just be sure to get a kind that already exists where you are. You don't want to be driving out the dragonflies you already have.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-17 04:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-17 04:50 pm (UTC)Unlike Myhrvold, though, I never took the easy step of building a system that could zap captive mosquitoes contained in a glass tank conveniently backed by a reflective background upon which an optical tracker can detect their shadows. That seems a bit too much like dynamiting fish in a barrel. It's a mere engineering problem.
What I wanted to do was to come up with a system capable of tracking and targeting free-flying mosquitoes in open air against random backgrounds, and able to detect when a human was in the line of fire and hold its fire. I so far haven't ever come up with a solution to that problem, and until I do, I don't consider it worth building one. I suspect it would begin with using ultrasonic acoustic sensors to detect and acquire targets, but it's narrowing that down and acquiring a sufficiently precise target lock on a free-flying mosquito against an unknown background to achieve a laser kill without collateral damage that's the real problem. About the only thing I can think of that might be both workable and eye-safe is phased-array millimeter-wave radar, and that has its own drawbacks for use around people or animals.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-17 05:04 pm (UTC)However, just a thought, it might be easy to make nano-robots that use the bidirectional microphone technique to zoom in on the mosquito's sound and pursue them. If caught, they can just grab them and bring them down. If not caught, they drive them away from you, which is sorta the point anyway.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-17 06:04 pm (UTC)Although robots that just chase them down and eat them would be neat too.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-17 05:17 pm (UTC)I don't really want to upset ecological balances; a lot of extremely fine species eat mosquitoes. What I'd like is a very effective repellent that isn't toxic to humans and that bypasses the problem with present repellents, which, as far as I can see, is that the mosquito thinks, "oo, carbon dioxide, food, whee!" and zooms in, and then thinks, "Yuck, not food. But carbon dioxide, food! But it's not food! But it's food!" So they mostly don't bite, but they won't LEAVE.
P.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-17 06:07 pm (UTC)There are similar and cheaper options as well.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-17 05:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-17 06:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-17 10:18 pm (UTC)http://www.worth1000.com/emailthis.asp?image=24555
no subject
Date: 2009-03-18 02:23 am (UTC)