So one of the odder things about going to zoos without kids is that all of the parents look at you with great suspicion when you take photos of their children. So it was quite the treat to go to the Brookfield zoo with all the buttons and fishes. I spent very little time getting photos of non-primate animals, but took a lot of shots of the wee ones that were running and rolling around with us.
Some things I learned:
* Sticks are neat
* Dirt is AWESOME
* Dirt is so awesome, it is of vital importance to check that it's still there
* Brothers are puzzling
I will point out that I don't have a lot of experience taking people photos, much less of children. I pretty much just followed the "have the camera ready, push the button" method, so they might look a bit different than my other photos. However, the set is here.
Also, before you jump to the highlights, I want to say that this is the first set I've completely processed with my new monitor and colour-management system. Since I am colourblind, I would greatly appreciate input as to it looks compared to my earlier stuff. If I've screwed up the colour, I'd like to catch it before I go too far into this system.

























Some things I learned:
* Sticks are neat
* Dirt is AWESOME
* Dirt is so awesome, it is of vital importance to check that it's still there
* Brothers are puzzling
I will point out that I don't have a lot of experience taking people photos, much less of children. I pretty much just followed the "have the camera ready, push the button" method, so they might look a bit different than my other photos. However, the set is here.
Also, before you jump to the highlights, I want to say that this is the first set I've completely processed with my new monitor and colour-management system. Since I am colourblind, I would greatly appreciate input as to it looks compared to my earlier stuff. If I've screwed up the colour, I'd like to catch it before I go too far into this system.

























no subject
Date: 2010-05-01 02:58 am (UTC)I do see a bit much red in the cheeks, but that may be because the little fellow is rosy cheeked as opposed to the color being made more red if that helps any.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-01 03:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-01 03:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-01 03:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-01 03:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-01 03:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-01 03:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-01 03:11 am (UTC)Especially when a strange person is walking around you going "click click" all the time.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-01 05:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-01 03:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-01 03:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-01 03:13 am (UTC)However, the third picture and the one near the end with the pacifier -- oh my ghods those blue eyes with the spangles.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-01 04:58 am (UTC)Out of curiosity, does the older one have Down's? Doesn't seem to stop him being an awesome kid any more than any other Down's kid I know, it's just the facial shapes and body language that tagged it for me.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-01 10:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-01 05:59 am (UTC)There are a lot more puzzled sister shots in the full set. I love the full set as much as the highlights this time around. Wow.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-01 08:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-01 09:43 pm (UTC)I was going to mention some orangey glare on a couple of the pics, but since no one else has mentioned it, it's very probably my monitor. Mostly I love the colour and contrast balance, it seems perfect.